Listen to this post
I think we need to have a discussion about the difference between “credentialed” and “qualified.”
I not long ago got to once again experience the thing where I am the only person in the room not given a title. Probably not a coincidence that I was also the only woman. Ordinarily, I don’t insist on titles, because I think insisting that people call me “Doctor Lanclos” is kind of a dick move. But if everyone else is given their titles, then I guess I should ask for it too, since I did earn that PhD way back when I was 29.
The thing is, that PhD is not really a credential, but evidence of a particular educational experience on my part. What qualifies me to do my current work is my experience with a particular methodological and theoretical approach, and at this point the fact that I’ve been working in academic libraries and HE environments in the UK and US for the last seven years.
I am qualified. Not because of my PhD, even if that does open doors for me.
I am so conflicted about that last sentence. If the only reason anyone listens to me (if anyone listens to me) is because I have a PhD, I actually don’t want their attention, or to be present with them in any fashion.
I work with people in many different contexts who do not have PhDs and my God are they ever qualified. Some of the most innovative and impactful work I see around me in terms of pedagogy, space, place, and learning is being done by people who do not have PhDs.
I don’t give a shit about your PhD, I care about your work.
And you shouldn’t care about my PhD, you should care about my work.
Insisting on PhDs (or any other terminal degree) as a credential is to fall into the trap of thinking that a degree is the same thing as a qualification. It’s NOT. It might be, but that requires critical thought about the nature of a person’s experience, how their work is relevant, and insists on you engaging with a person rather than reading a CV with a list of boxes that have been ticked.
We should not do that credentialing dance with our colleagues any more than we should with our students.
“Your edu-ma-cation ain’t no hipper than what you understand.”
Take it, Dr. John: